Thursday, March 9, 2023

Waiting for the Freakshow

 On September 30th a couple were arrested at Cedar Point for charges of "public indecency" for engaging in a sexual act in public as they were waiting to enter a haunted house, the Fairground Freakshow.  A 17-year girl waiting in line capture the incident on video.

Do such sexual acts cause harm to anyone?  If not, should such actions be illegal?

Obesity and Paternalism

 Rates of obesity in the United States are alarming -- and efforts to reverse the trend seem ineffective.  According the Center for Disease Control and Prevention 38 percent of U. S adults are obese and 17 percent of teenagers as well.  Another third or so of Americans are overweight.  Obesity can lead to serious health conditions such as heart disease and diabetes.  Some governments have attempted or considered paternalistic interventions to stem the tide of obesity.  New York city, for instance, attempted to ban the sale of soda pop in sixes greater that 16 oz.  Other cities such as Berkeley and Philadelphia have passed a soda tax.  In Philadelphia distributors are taxed 1.5 cents per once on soda pop and other sweetened drinks: a 2 liter bottle of pop that used to cost $1.79 now sells for $2.79 because of an added dollar in tax.


These laws are intended to help consumers in these cities -- but have they gone too far?  Are these laws and taxes justified? Why or why not?

No More Drag Performance?

On March 2, 2023 Bill Lee, Governor of Tennessee, signed a bill banning drag shows in public spaces, a law that more than likely will force drag shows to go underground in the state.  Other states are also considering similar measures.  In arguing for the justification for this law, State Rep. Jack Johnson, a Republican and co-sponsor of the bill claimed: "We're protecting kids and families and parents who want to be able to take their kids to public places. We're not attacking anyone or targeting anyone."

Is this law justified according to Mill's views -- or any other view we have examined?  Examine at least one justification for legal coercion and argue whether this law is justified under that principle.



Gun Ownership and the Risks of Harm

Last year (2022) Gov. DeWine signed Senate Bill 215 into law.  The law permits anyone 21 years or older in Ohio to legally possess a handgun to be carried and concealed without a license or firearms training.  The bill would also reduce penalties if a gun owner does not properly notify law enforcement that they have a firearm in their possession.

Is this law justified?  Does such a law make gun possession more dangerous?  How does it compare to things like the possession of dangerous material such as poison, fertilizer and plutonium? Can the Harm to Others Principle justify restrictions and/or prohibitions on gun possession?

Waiting for the Freakshow

 On September 30th a couple were arrested at Cedar Point for charges of "public indecency" for engaging in a sexual act in public ...